|
|

|
Cologne,
October, 2014
Contents:
Editorial
- Interview
- Featured
topic
- Figure
of the month
- News
& events
|
|

A
new mind-set for General Aviation
The Agency has put in place the ‘New Approach
towards General Aviation’ as part of the strategy to
change fundamentally the way the GA sector is regulated
in Europe. The new approach to General Aviation is about
creating a more proportionate framework, focusing on
safety culture, safety promotion and common sense! We
are already delivering the first results of the process
as it is also described in the GA Roadmap Report 2014.
During
the EASA Safety Conference on GA in Rome I heard very
interesting views and proposals on how to make GA more
accessible and more enjoyable. I expressed the six
commitments of
the Agency to the rest of the GA community.
Success
does not depend only on EASA actions or decisions, but
also on coordinated actions, decisions and support by
all other members in the GA community. The era of
passive criticism has come to an end; this is the time
of active participation and positive contribution for
change. We are at the start of the process to change the
regulatory environment for GA and the mind-set of
regulator, as well as the rest of the General Aviation
community.
We
are working towards simplifying the regulatory framework
for GA, enabling its revival and ultimately its growth.
Patrick
Ky
EASA
Executive Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Mr Grant V. Shapps is a prominent
politician in the UK as Tory Party Chairman, MP and
Minister, but more importantly for EASA, he is an
advocate for General Aviation and for cutting ‘red
tape’. Mr Shapps opened the EASA Safety Conference in
Rome and also participated in the keynote discussion,
urging regulators to make General Aviation more
accessible, enabling its growth in Europe. Following the
Conference, we had a short interview with the Minister
on his views about General Aviation and the role of the
Agency.
Mr
Shapps, what were your impressions about the conference?
With
the highest attendance ever seen at an EASA Conference,
there can be no doubt that this year’s edition was a
huge success. There is a clearly a drive across the
whole of Europe to improve the way that we regulate
General Aviation, and unlock its potential for jobs and
growth. The speakers that I saw were all excellent, and
brought a raft of fresh ideas to the debate about how to
ensure that we have a vibrant GA sector in Europe. In
particular, there was a welcome focus on the role of
“airmanship” in aviation safety, with the
accompanying suggestion that regulatory oversight would
be better focussed on improving pilots’ skills rather
than asking them to memorize and comply with more rules.
During
the conference you highlighted the need to make sure
that regulation of General Aviation is as light-touch as
possible. How can this be best achieved?
The
UK deregulatory example, where reducing the burden of
red tape has resulted in savings for business of around
£850 million per year, shows that by cutting back on
unnecessary rulemaking, we can boost both jobs and
economic growth. At the Conference, there was a definite
sense that this is something that attendees wanted to
see replicated in General Aviation. There is doubtless a
need to re-examine all of the rules that we have in
place to see whether they are producing a measurable
safety benefit. In many cases, there is little evidence
to show that particular rules or regulations result in
any tangible increase in safety. It is my firm belief
that we have the right people in place to deliver these
changes from the top, including EASA’s Patrick Ky and
the UK CAA’s Andrew Haines (although I admit I could
be accused of bias in this latter case!), however
representatives from the sector itself must also unite
behind this drive. Time and again I have seen GA pilots
unwilling to accept the significant changes the sector
needs for fear of a hypothetical safety risk. We must
take the line that if there is no evidence supporting a
rule, then it should go.
What
do you believe is the role of the Agency in the process
to get there?
EASA
have the most significant role to play in this work.
There is a feeling that the approach to regulation so
far has been to apply the same standards to GA as have
been used in commercial aviation in the past, leading to
a reliance on rules over an understanding of the
dangers. As Andrew Haines pointed out, written exams do
not lead to better airmanship. EASA must take steps to
delegate some of the responsibility for improving
airmanship to those closest to the pilots – either to
the sector itself or to national aviation authorities.
Similarly the Agency must continue to move away from a
regulatory regime developed for commercial air transport
to one that is proportionate and effective for promoting
General Aviation. If something has been proven to be
successful elsewhere (for example a piece of equipment
or regulatory approach), EASA must not delay
implementation in Europe to run tests that have already
been undertaken elsewhere.
The
General Aviation sector across Europe needs substantial
change and needs it now. Patrick Ky has been
instrumental in kick-starting this work, for which I am
hugely grateful, but now EASA must do all it can to
speed up implementation of its new approach to General
Aviation and deliver on the commitments it made at the
Conference. Our citizens are impatient for us to get on
with delivering the changes we have promised, and only
by making these can we unlock GA’s full potential for
jobs and growth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

A
new approach to General Aviation: the GA Road Map
The
greater focus on General Aviation has boosted the
profile of GA activities, becoming a priority for both,
the European Commission and EASA. The Agency has
started work towards creating a simpler, lighter and
better regulatory environment for General Aviation in
Europe: the GA Road Map initiative. The aim is to create
a regulatory framework which best reflects the realities
of General Aviation, such as the diverse type of
operations, the involvement of individuals rather than
organisations and the regional rather than international
character. The latest update on this work has been
presented and discussed in Rome at EASA Annual Safety
Conference on 14-15 October 2014. The next update will
be given during the AERO 2015 exhibition in April 2015.
Here you have an overview of the background and
activities already made in this area.
The
‘New Approach to GA’ provides an outline of the
measures required to move faster towards a more
sustainable development of GA in Europe. It
describes the way to support GA while ensuring an
appropriate level of protection and allowing for the
regional and international context of the GA industry.
Key
elements identified are: • Change the way the ‘EASA
system’ operates. • Simplification of the
applicable regulations to GA. • Review current
principles applicable to GA.
The
paper also recognises that changes to European policy
need to be based on close monitoring of the sector and
use of GA expertise and full stakeholder consultation,
in order to arrive at the most appropriate and
supportive policy solution.
As
part of its call for development of an integrated
framework, the Agency has set-up collaborative working
groups composed by representatives from National
Aviation authorities, the industry, GA users and
professionals that propose targeted actions, taking into
account the unique characteristics of the sector. Aided
by positive policy developments, it has enabled
stakeholders and regulators to produce a jointly
accepted road map for necessary change.
The
Agency firmly believes that the GA Road Map initiative
provides an appropriate framework for policy improvement
for the GA Sector. It requires not only a change of
methods, rules and ways of working, but more importantly
a change of mind-set in the way regulators, as well as
the rest of the GA community manage safety. Change
cannot be achieved by any single organisation or person
but requires cooperation and joint effort from all
parties involved: the European Commission, EASA, all
members of the GA community, national authorities,
associations, clubs and individuals: Together working
towards simpler, lighter better rules for General
Aviation.
AND…. 1.
Towards a more proportional approach to GA 2. Towards
using knowledge and experience from external parties to
EASA 3. Towards a better organisational approach 4.
Towards proportionate GA aircraft airworthiness
requirements 5. Towards simpler licences for GA
aircraft mechanics 6. Towards reducing 'red tape' for
aircraft maintenance 7. Towards helping reduce
maintenance and operating costs 8. Towards a
regulatory approach reflecting the unique
characteristics of GA 9. Towards a flexible approach
to pilot training 10. Towards… more changes!
These
and other changes as well as the project structure are
available under www.easa.europa.eu/ga
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

EU-USA
Estimated Fatalities in General Aviation per 1000
aircraft
|

|
|
The
graph shows the rate of fatalities per 1,000 aircraft in
the GA fleet. It shows that per 1,000 aircraft, the
estimated rate of fatalities is much higher in Europe
than in the US. Fleet size was chosen for the rate
calculation, because currently there is no reliable
pan-European data available on flight hours or
number of flights.
Source:
EASA Safety Analysis and Research section 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

EASA
proposes a new path for private pilot training
The
Agency has proposed a more pragmatic and proportionate
approach for pilot training, together with an extension
of the deadline for the enter-into force date of the
applicable requirements. Among the improvements are
‘lighter’ means of compliance (called AMC’s) and
the possibility to obtain basic pilot licenses (like
private pilot or light aircraft) outside of approved
training organisations (for example from aero-clubs).
Also, the deadline of April 2015, is currently reviewed
towards extending it into the future. A phased approach
for compliance by training organisations for
professional pilots is also foreseen. These changes come
as EASA took into consideration the concerns expressed
by regulated parties and they are the result of close
cooperation between the European Commission, national
aviation authorities and other stakeholders.
|
|
|
EASA
rulemaking process - your feedback is welcome!
One
of the Agency’s core values is to strive to satisfy
our stakeholders' expectations without compromising our
responsibilities for safety and environmental
protection, by inspiring confidence, in particular to
the general public, while ensuring that we act in an
effective and efficient way.
Within
this context, we have decided to conduct stakeholder
satisfaction surveys on a regular basis in order to
continuously improve our processes. We would therefore
like to encourage you to provide us with your feedback
by filling in the following questionnaire:
http://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/Rule2014
The
survey will be kept open till 14
November.
To complete the survey will take you no longer than 10
minutes.
Thank
you for your time.
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 Facebook
|
 Twitter
|
Ottoplatz,
1 D-50679 Cologne Germany
|
Tel
+49 221
8999 000 Fax +49
221 8999 099 http://easa.europa.eu
|
|
|
|
|